Monday, November 30, 2009

Switzerland: No More Minarets!

I briefly mentioned in an earlier post about a referendum in Switzerland in which a majority of the voters decided in favor of banning the building of minarets on Islamic mosques. Now before anybody starts accusing me of possibly supporting the infringement of Islamists' rights to worship freely, there's more to the story.

Now, first off, what is a minaret? Very simply, a tall tower with a balcony from which a muezzin calls Islamists to prayer. What is a muezzin? Also very simply, the name given to a man who calls the Islamists to prayer. If you've ever heard a muezzin call Islamists to prayer, you wouldn't forget it, and because devout Islamists have to pray five times a day, that's how many times one would have to hear the muezzin call.

Anyway, back to the story, there is a reason why banning the building of minarets is a good thing. According to an opinion piece in The Jerusalem Post, a minaret (and also a mosque) are seen as symbols of Islamic power; the writer of the piece notes the building of a mosque in Delhi, India was done to celebrate the conquest of the city by Islamists. There is also the matter of the chanting done from the minaret done those five times a day when Islamists are called to prayer. The concern of the Swiss people in this matter is the rise of Islam (particularly fundamental Islam), and in the end, the majority of the Swiss people said NO to the minarets.

Unsurprisingly, those on the Left are in an uproar, crying religious freedom has been infringed; one reporter for Reuters is also claiming this could signal a “new right-wing surge”. Using the argument of the Left on this matter, if a minaret is just part of the service of worship for Islamists, why do everybody else have to hear it? Why does everybody else have to listen five times a day to Islamic chanting, especially during hours when people are still asleep? And for those who may counter with the fact Christian churches ring the bells during their services, that's not the same thing. In fact, bells are not just rung at churches; they can and are also rung in other buildings (any building with a clock tower, quite frankly).

Switzerland, I might point out, is not the only country where an effort is being made to put an end to the loud calls to prayer from the muezzins; in Israel, there's a member of the Israeli Knesset (Parliament) who has a bill which would silence them. The reason cited for the bill is because of the loud noise, but needless to say, the MK in question has already been called a racist for his actions. What else is new?

The banning of minarets being built in Switzerland is a good idea not only because people who aren't Islamists don't have to listen to the loud calls to prayer five times a day, but more importantly, it sends a message that political Islam, fundamental Islam, extremist Islam isn't welcome in Switzerland.

On the Israeli settlements

I haven't written much at all about what's been going on in Israel, but I have heard about the latest story involving the Israelis, with their efforts to expand their settlements in the West Bank, and the opposition of the Obama administration (particularly, the State Department) to those expansions.

Thanks to an organization called the Jewish Internet Defense Force (JIDF), I came across an article from The Jerusalem Post in which it is claimed the Israeli settlements are in fact legal, and that if Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continues to insist the settlements are illegal, she herself is advocating a violation of international law. The basis is that of a treaty signed by the U.S. in the 1920's which gave the West Bank to the Israelis.

It is my opinion that since Israel took over control of the West Bank in 1967, it's their land and if they want to expand on Jewish settlements in the West Bank, let them do so (it is also my opinion the Palestinians are not entitled to the Gaza Strip or the West Bank, nor should the Syrians have the Golan Heights for reasons of Israel's security; just to let you know my opinions on land entitlements in Israel).

Hopefully, the Israeli government will do what is right for their country and their people, which I don't believe for a minute includes kowtowing to Hillary Clinton and the rest of the Obama administration.

Coming out of the darkness?

What a year 2009 has been for Honduras; having to wage a David-and-Goliath battle against the major powers of the West (especially Venezuela and the U.S.) after their President, manuel Zelaya, was deported for his illegal actions. But there is the possibility that this small Central American nation will come out the winner.

Elections were recently held without any hitches for President and for Congress, and according to an editorial in The Wall Street Journal, the fact the elections were held in the first place is a victory for all who seek liberty, and especially for Honduras. The losers, meanwhile, are said to not only be Hugo Chavez and Manuel Zelaya, but also the nations that tried to stop the election and the Organization of American States (OAS), now considered discredited for deciding not to recognize the results of the election.

For a while, it seemed like Honduras was about to be forcibly re-entered into the darkness Zelaya tried to take Honduras into before he was deposed as President. Now, with the election having been held, and the results to be recognized by the U.S. (about time Obama did something right for a change) and other nations, Honduras may very well be on the road out of that darkness. Wonderful news, indeed.

And, in another respect, the election is another victory against Progressive forces throughout the world, as Rodan at The Blogmocracy has written. Add in the results of the gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey and the success of the banning of building minarets on Islamic mosques in Switzerland, and you have consecutive blows to the causes of Progressive forces. Most wonderful news, indeed (and in time for Christmas, no less).

The latest from Sarah: If We're In It, Let's Win It

Thanksgiving's over, and Sarah Palin is taking out the big guns once again:

As Thanksgiving festivities wind down we contemplate all we have to be thankful for as free Americans! We head into the Christmas season wishing for leadership in Washington that reflects our commitment to the values and ideals that have built the freest and most prosperous and generous nation on earth.

Heading into December and Tuesday’s announcement of our nation’s strategy in Afghanistan, I ask the President to reassure us that the administration is in this War on Terror to win.

And I’ll pass along the following from Harold B. Estes, a 95-year-old member of the Greatest Generation: “I realize you never served in the military and never had to defend your country with your life, but you’re the Commander-in-Chief now, son. Do your job. When your battle-hardened field General asks you for 40,000 more troops to complete the mission, give them to him. But if you’re not in this fight to win, then get out.”

Thank you, Mr. President. Please tell us on Tuesday that America is in it to win.

- Sarah Palin

PS: You can read Mr. Estes' complete letter here.
Read the letter. The man says it like I never can. Thank you, Mr. Estes, and thanks for your service.

Saturday, November 28, 2009

“Ignorance” is bliss

One of the things I have learned about the Left (and a couple of willing idiots as well) is sometimes they are guilty of the very things they accuse others of being. A recent post from Michael van der Galien at David Horowitz's NewsReal blog is one such example.

Mr. van der Galien writes of a blogger and Palin-basher named Tina Brown, who accused the former Governor of Alaska of having a confidence based on ignorance, and indirectly accused those of us who support Governor Palin of the same thing. Mr. van der Galien gave a great rebuttal to Ms. Brown's absurd accusation:
Have you ever heard of a total ignoramus who was a great governor nonetheless? Right, me neither.
The confidence Sarah Palin exudes is the same confidence Ronald Reagan exuded when he was alive; do you really need three guesses to find out how he turned out as Governor of California and later President?

Looking at the Governor's record in Alaska and her stances on the issues, I accuse Tina Brown of having a confidence based on ignorance. She has to be totally ignorant to make such an absurd claim against Sarah as she has. Of course, as it's said, ignorance is bliss, but it's rather our “ignorance” which is blissful, not Tina Brown's.

Friday, November 27, 2009

A couple of must-reads

I've come across a pair of excellent articles very much worth reading:

David Horowitz, writing this for the website Front Page Magazine, presents a strategy Tea Partiers (and I would also say 9/12er's and like-minded groups) can use in the continuing battle against the Left. Being someone who was a member of the hard Left for years, what Mr. Horowitz has to say carries a lot of weight with it. Our political enemies know how to play the game; why shouldn't we?

Written for the New York Daily News, Stephen Norwood writes of the cancellation of an appearance at Princeton and Columbia by Nonie Darwish, a well known opponent of Islamic jihad, and of a similar incident of a man named Ernst Toller whose appearance at Queens College in New York was also cancelled...in 1938. A German Jew known to be an ardent opponent of Nazism, Mr. Toller was later allowed to speak at Queens College, but the parallels are telling. It seems some things never change, do they?

Climategate, Cap-and-Trade and Copenhagen

With the opening of Pandora's Box (otherwise known as Climategate), the immediate implication of the scandal is what will happen to the Waxman-Markey bill (Cap-and-Trade) and the upcoming UN conference in Copenhagen on climate change. The question is: Will either the cap-and-trade bill or the Copenhagen treaty continue as planned?

Gerald Warner, a columnist for the Telegraph in Britain has an interesting piece on the possible scuttling of the cap-and-trade bill (thanks to the scandal), noting that for the first time, AGW (anthropogenic global warming) proponents are on the defensive in this battle. However, the release of the e-mails in question apparently isn't going to stop the Obama administration from going through with the UN treaty in Copenhagen.

Stephen Dinan, in an article for The Washington Times, writes of the President's climate czar rejecting the claims global warming numbers were trumped up, claiming “the science is settled”. Mr. Dinan also writes the President (according to the White House) intends to go to Copenhagen “to commit the U.S. to greenhouse gas reductions”.

As certain as I am that the opening of Pandora's Box is helping to scuttle the efforts of radical environmentalists the world over, this won't stop the Obama administration or the UN from pursuing their agendas. The cap-and-trade bill may be dead, but the Copenhagen treaty is still a go, as far as President Obama is concerned. The good thing about all this, though, is we now have plenty of ammunition to level at the environmentalists.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Welcome, Robbing America, The Clue Batting Cage & The Hellcat Republican

Three more blogs have been added to the Bloggers for Sarah Palin blogroll; John Galt and his blog Robbing America, Phil at The Clue Batting Cage, and Scott B (at Amorian) has started another blog, The Hellcat Republican. Welcome aboard, guys, to the good fight for Sarah Palin, and also, a happy Thanksgiving to all my fellow Bloggers for Sarah Palin, new and old alike.

I am thankful for...

  1. a God who created me in his own image and loved me so much he sent his Son to save my soul from eternal damnation
  2. the fact I was born and raised in the greatest nation ever created
  3. my family and friends, especially my nephew, who is still a bundle of something
  4. the fact I am in good health after 26 1/2 years of living
  5. all the men and women serving in the military who are out there to ensure I and countless others can breathe freely, speak freely, worship freely, live freely
A happy and blessed Thanksgiving to all of you.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Grassroots News Minute (November 25th)

The latest from Sarah: Happy Thanksgiving

A Thanksgiving greeting from Sarah Palin:

Over three hundred years ago, a group of settlers fleeing religious persecution decided to set a new course for human history in a new frontier. Those early pioneers chose a rocky shoreline to establish their way of life. Centuries later, America continues to set the example of what can come from a free and hardworking people. We truly remain the shining city upon a hill that the colonial leader John Winthrop implored us to be.

What started as a small colony in the territory that would eventually become the Commonwealth of Massachusetts has progressed into the greatest and most prosperous nation in history. Americans remain the freest people on earth because of our cherished Constitution and the system of government it establishes.

We have so much to be thankful for. We should recognize especially the sacrifices made on our behalf by those in uniform. Thousands of Americans will be spending Thanksgiving overseas in combat zones in order to protect our liberty and way of life. We should give thanks to those who willingly put their lives on the line for the rest of us. Where would we be without them?

We are also thankful for what God has granted us. We are truly blessed in America with rich natural resources, plentiful energy sources, fertile land, beautiful cities, and the talented and industrious people we call “our fellow Americans.” We pray that God will continue to bless us.

In his farewell address to the nation, President Reagan reminded us that “all great change in America begins at the dinner table.” Thanksgiving is an opportunity to discuss where we are as a nation at this moment in our history and where we should be heading in order to remain prosperous and free. Take time to discuss these things with each other, and take time to teach the young people in your family about our nation’s history so that they may never forget all that we have to be proud of and thankful for.

Happy Thanksgiving!

- Sarah Palin
And a happy Thanksgiving to you and your family, Governor.

On The Wilding of Sarah Palin

A contributor to the website American Thinker known as Robin of Berkley wrote an article yesterday about the sexual themed attacks lobbed against Sarah Palin since coming into national prominence last year, and also about the behavior towards women and children from the far Left of the Democratic Party.

During the 2008 election and since then, I've come across most of the sexually themed remarks, insults and cartoons which were aimed at Governor Palin, and naturally found them all to be disgusting, but after reading Robin's article (in particular, the motivation behind the attacks and behavior), I am now angered.

This wilding (as Robin called it) of Sarah Palin by the Left is further proof of how they will use any and everybody and everything to achieve their goals, no matter how disgusting, perverted and despicable their methods are. The Left knows no boundaries, no limits and no scruples; it's that simple. Read the whole of Robin's article, and know the enemy.

Pandora's Box is open

I posted a while ago about the release of e-mails from and to scientists involving global warming, but I believe I really understated the impact of this episode, which has turned into something of a scandal now being referred to by some as Climategate.

snork, writing a guest post at The Blogmocracy, has a roundup on the whole thing so far, and needless to say the implication from all this could very well be the scuttling of efforts to “address” the “threat” of man-made global warming (this could include the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill and even possibly the UN's Copenhagen treaty).

This is definitely looking like the unknown hacker or whistleblower opened Pandora's Box, and hopefully the result will be the undoing of the agendas of environmentalists and opportunists seeking to change America into some kind of green utopia.

The latest from Sarah: Congress Never Ceases To Amaze

From Sarah Palin's latest Facebook note:

Really? A tax on national defense? I hear liberal Congressional proposals and I, like most Americans, wonder if they’re serious. We’re going to put a price tag on security?

With Congress and President Obama spending money on everything at breakneck speed, it’s interesting that they are only now getting nervous about spending – but only when it comes to providing the necessary funds to complete our mission in Afghanistan. They don’t need a new “war tax” to fund a strategy for victory in the war zone. They simply need to prioritize our money appropriately.

I find it telling that the Pelosi-Reid Congress is only cost-conscious when it comes to our national defense. Scary. Nonsensical. Unacceptable.

- Sarah Palin
Personally, I don't know if I'd use the word amaze; the word outrage would be more likely. Also, Governor Palin provided more photos from her book tour in a previous note; if you haven't seen them yet, go right ahead.

Monday, November 23, 2009

The latest from Sarah: US Troops Must be Second to None

Here's the latest from Sarah Palin on Facebook:

Can’t wait to meet our troops – and all those who love the U.S. Armed Forces – today at Ft. Bragg. Read my book’s dedication page. The book is for these Patriots who fight for freedom. They deserve our support and our government’s unwavering commitment to equipping them for victory.

The book tour is beyond all expectations. This feels like the time when a team comes together, gearing up before a major competition to show unity and supply strength and encouragement to each team member equally, regardless of the team member’s role or title.

On this tour I hear the grave concerns Americans have for our children’s future. I also feel the hope so many of you want to cling to – hope for those on Capitol Hill to see the light, hope for politicians to be humble enough to acknowledge that growing the federal government isn’t the answer to our economic challenges, hope that it won’t take another terrorist strike to wake us up to continued threats by those who hate America and our allies.

At every stop on this tour I see Americans coming together to say, “Enough. We love our country too much to just sit down and shut up while politicians take us for a ride. We shall be heard.”

We see a united team.

Now, I want to give you more hope: We are Americans. Anything is possible in America. Anyone can make a positive difference. You don’t need a title or a political position or a pedigree. We can take our country back from those who think growing national debt will grow prosperity for us, the little guys. We can take it back from those who think shrinking military power will make the homeland safer for us, the little guys.

We can take it back because we’re fired up, and we’re all about telling our government to listen to us, trust us, get back on our side… or politicians: you’re fired.

Plunging our country deeper and deeper in debt; borrowing billions from foreign countries; relying on foreign nations to supply us with energy; talking about sanctions against dangerous regimes but not following through; hesitating to surge aggressively to stop terrorist strongholds from growing; allowing government to take over health care, banks, the auto industry, and who knows what else they’ve got up their sleeves... it’s all too much and we’ve had enough.

Ronald Reagan knew it took a united team to right the wrongs of Washington. He told his team in essence, “Gentlemen and Ladies, I hate inflation; I hate taxes; I hate terrorists. Do something about it.”

America, you’re doing something about it! Thank you for standing up and speaking out. Thank you for holding on to hope, for loving America so passionately and supporting our troops who fight for freedom. Keep the faith!

- Sarah Palin

PS: Please continue to follow the tour’s progress by following me on Twitter atSarahPalinUSA. Enjoy the photos below!
There are pictures below the note of the book tour and also of Governor Palin's visit with Billy Graham at his home. By all means, take a look and enjoy.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Countdown to Judgment Day


That's what awaited my dad and I when we entered Lakeview Middle School in Warsaw for a major rally to kick off the 2010 election season.
The rally was held in the school's gym. I've read the number there was at 1,000 to 1,500, but frankly, I don't know. A lot of people, there were certainly were.
Peter Recchio of the Michiana 9/12 Project got the rally started. Scheduled to start at noon (about the time we arrived at the school), the rally began not long after. After a medley of patriotic songs were sung, we began hearing the keynote speakers. The big surprise of the rally was right after the singing when we saw a video featuring none other than Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann wishing us the best.
Author Thomas Tabback kicked it off with a rousing speech. I had heard him speak before, and frankly, he does Texas proud.
Emery McClendon spoke next; his speech was as rousing as Mr. Tabback's. He started up the Fort Wayne Tea Party on April 18th (bringing in Alan Keyes to speak as well), and I first heard him speak on September 1st during the townhall meeting featuring our U.S. Senators (sorta).
Wes Robinson, a male nurse and candidate for State Representative in Indiana's 97th District, spoke of the time he spent in Alaska and in Burma, and how he never expected he would be here now.
Rev. C.L. Bryant from Shreveport, Louisiana was next to speak, and boy, just when I thought I had heard some rousing speeches, he gave the most rousing speech I had yet heard.
Peter Heck, a teacher, writer and radio host from Kokomo, was spot on in his speech. After the speakers had finished, we all had a short break as the stage was set for a candidates forum featuring the three men seeking the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate against Evan Bayh. Outside the gym, there were a number of booths, including booths with information about some of the 9/12 groups, the candidates for the Senate, a man named Phil Troyer (whose running for Congress against Congressman Souder in the primary), the FairTax, the NRA & Huck PAC.
Left to right: Josh Gillespie of Hoosier Access, who was the moderator; Don Bates, Jr., Richard Behney and State Senator Marlin Stutzman.
Mr. Bates, who has worked in the financial services industry for 14 years, began with his introductory remarks.
Mr. Behney, a licensed plumber who organized the Indianapolis Tea Party on April 15th, was next with his remarks.
Mr. Stutzman, a state legislator for six years, concluded the introductory remarks with his own.
Now, as you may have already known, I'm supporting Sen. Stutzman in this election, but I found all three spoke well and concluded any of them would make a good U.S. Senator. There were very few disagreements between the candidates (the 17th Amendment and term limits), but the disagreements themselves are not major.
One of the last questions asked of the candidates was about the FairTax, and all the candidates expressed support for the idea of a national sales tax.

At about 3:30 in the afternoon, the rally was over. I wished both Mr. Bates and Mr. Behney good luck with their campaigns, signed petitions to put both of them on the ballot (because they're willing to put their lives and careers on hold to run for the Senate, they deserve to have their names on the ballot), went over to the FairTax booth to get information and left. It was quite a day, indeed; the countdown to judgment day, November 2nd, 2010, has begun.

Saturday, November 21, 2009

The latest from Sarah: In The Midnight Hour

Sarah Palin wrote last night in her latest Facebook note of the Senate voting to proceed with the monstrosity known as the Senate's new health care bill:

The Senate is set to vote Saturday night, right before the holiday, on a motion to proceed on its latest health care government take-over bill. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is pushing for yet another weekend vote (commonplace now for the party of “transparency”) because he knows that the American people will be none too happy about the Democrats’ proposal the longer they have to look it over.

A vote against the Democrats’ motion will help stop Obamacare before it gets any closer to becoming a reality. While this Saturday night vote might seem like a procedural matter, at the end of the day a vote against Senator Reid’s motion is a vote against massive new government spending and a take-over of 1/6th of the U.S. economy; it’s a vote against billions in tax increases and penalties; it’s a vote against federal funding of abortion; and it’s a vote against ignoring responsible tort reform.

And in case you hadn’t heard – just a reminder that you’ll start paying higher taxes to fund this scheme in 2010 even though it doesn’t start up until 2014. Only in Washington does that make any sense. Among the provisions in this bill will be a $2500 cap on Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs). The IRS allows families with special needs children to use FSAs to cover educational expenses. This new $2500 cap will hit these families especially hard and cost them hundreds of dollars in new taxes every year.

Contact your senators and tell them to vote against the motion to proceed tomorrow night. The American people don’t support this – we support the commonsense solutions that have been proposed, but totally ignored by (at this point) some out-of-control Washington politicians. Let’s put a stop to Obamacare before it goes any further.

- Sarah Palin

Rational Advice or Rationed Care?

Early yesterday morning, Governor Palin wrote on Facebook about a particular portion in the new Senate health care bill:

It was a breath of fresh air to finally hear the Democrats admit to their health care bill as “a lot of show and tell and razzmatazz,” (see Democrat talking points, in reference to my book). At least now we’re all on the same page when discussing the problems with their monstrous government health care “reform” plan.

Now, tonight, more disconcerting news – the New York Times reports of new guidelines to scale back cervical cancer screenings. The recommendation from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists comes on the heels of another recommendation to limit breast cancer screenings with mammograms. There are many questions unanswered for me, but one which immediately comes to mind is whether costs have anything to do with these recommendations. The current health care debate elicits great concern because of its introduction of socialized medicine in America and the inevitable rationed care. We need to carefully watch this debate as it coincides with Capitol Hill’s debate and determine whether we are witnessing the early stages of that rationed care before the Senate bill is rushed through as well.

Another question is why these women-focused cancers are seemingly receiving substandard attention at a time when proactive health and fitness should be the message. Every woman should encourage rigorous debate to ensure that our collective voices are heard. We are paying attention to Washington’s health care proposals, and we want to hear what helps patients the most.

We need answers: Is early screening not saving lives? Why do doctors’ groups disagree? Did costs play any role in these decisions to change the recommendations on breast and cervical cancer screenings? We need assurances that everything we’ve heard this week about fewer tests for women’s cancers is a result of patient-focused research and providing the best care for the right reasons, and not because of bureaucratic pressure to control costs.

Obviously the first thought that comes to mind when hearing of these new recommendations from bureaucratic panels is “rationed care.” It’s fair – and healthy – to ask if that’s what Washington has in mind with a government-controlled takeover of a health care system.

- Sarah Palin
The decreasing of screenings Governor Palin writes of would be the first step down the slippery slope to the hell that is government controlled health care. This alone is more than enough reason to oppose this monstrosity of a bill.

Friday, November 20, 2009

The Going Rogue tour so far

Today found Sarah Palin in Ohio and Pennsylvania as her book tour continues. She posted today on Facebook about the tour in Michigan and Indiana, which included appearing in Fort Wayne:

The first three stops on the Going Rogue book tour have been exhilarating!

I am humbled by the outpouring of support and have so enjoyed meeting and hearing from such great Americans in Michigan and Indiana. Our next three stops will keep us in the Heartland, and we hope that you can make it to one of our events in Cincinnati or Columbus, Ohio; or Washington, Pennsylvania.

Enjoy the pictures and go rogue with us!

- Sarah Palin
As much as I wanted to be in Fort Wayne and have a copy of her book signed by Governor Palin, I was neither able to be there, nor has my copy arrived. She also wrote on Facebook this note:

The response on this book tour has been overwhelming. We are truly humbled, and I thank you.

I've been told that yesterday there were supporters in Noblesville who stood in long lines for hours in the cold and rain, and the book signing event ended without a chance to say hello to everyone who showed up. I am so sorry. We are working on a solution for those who were left behind.

I apologize.

- Sarah Palin
One final thing of note: if you noticed the picture of Governor Palin with her lookalike, I gotta tell you I am sure I saw that same woman in Noblesville during Governor Palin's first Indiana rally in the 2008 election! Do see the pictures taken of her book tour in Michigan and Indiana; it sure is something.

Taxes, taxes everywhere

That's what the health care bill introduced in the Senate recently has; all kinds of new taxes. An editorial from Investor's Business Daily features some of the new taxes and tax hikes, including a 40% tax on special health insurance plans, a .5% hike on the Medicare payroll tax & a 5% tax on elective cosmetic surgery. The editorial also mentions increased taxes on the insurance companies, said to bring in an additional $19 billion (but I seriously doubt it will).

I remember that when we were colonists, the British government starting taxes on all kinds of things (stamps, tea, paper, glass, etc.). We responded with outrage and were appeased to a degree, then we had a tea party to convey our grievances and ultimately we ended up going to war. Does Harry Reid have a problem figuring out how people are going to respond with these additional taxes he wants to impose on us?

Please read the editorial from Investor's Business Daily, and also an article from The Washington Times. What Senator Reid wishes to impose on us is as bad as what Lord Townshend wanted to impose on us almost 250 years ago.

Now isn't that interesting, chapter 29

In a comment he wrote on this blog, cbullitt at Soylent Green has a post on an interesting update involving scientists in Britain, their claim a solution (a la the Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade bill) would solve the problems with the environment and the information they had but withheld.

An unknown hacker broke into the files of the scientists in question, discovered the information previously requested but not given, and released it. Although the focus is on the hacking, the telling thing is the information itself, which seems to prove the claims made by the scientists are backed by distorted and misleading facts. Now that is interesting.

I have long believed the motivation behind the efforts to impose environment-related laws is politics; the science to prove their claims isn't irrefutable, isn't universally accepted and simply isn't there. Much thanks to cbullitt for the heads up.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Grassroots News Minute (November 20th)

Left or Right: Where One Truly Is In The Political Spectrum

(This post was written specifically for the website The Blogmocracy.)

On this blog, bringing up the issue of fascists and socialists and where they are in the political spectrum is borderline overkill, if not plain and simple overkill already. I myself have already written about the subject on this blog. However, this is something I believe needs to be said.

Fascists (a.k.a. Nazis) have usually been labeled as right-wing and socialists (a.k.a. Marxists, Stalinists, Communists, Trotskyists, Leninists, you get the idea) have been regarded as left-wing. Rodan, among others elsewhere in the Internet, has presented the arguments that fascists and socialists share very few differences. Looking at the stances the fascists and the socialists hold on the issues we contemplate over today, at the methods employed by both sides when they were (in some cases, are) in power, and at the goals both sides have sought, I agree with Rodan on his contention.

The one real difference between the fascists and the socialists is how they describe their ideology. The fascists describe their “struggle” along the lines of nationalism and racism, while the socialists describe theirs along the lines of societal classes. The ideological difference is there, but is so minor compared to everything else about both sides, it's a cosmetic difference. It is also a difference which doesn't differentiate where the two sides are on the American political spectrum.

The best way to prove both sides are left-wing in nature is to ask yourself this question: Where do they stand on the roles of the individual and the state in society? Based solely on the writings and spoken words of Hitler, Marx and Lenin, they contended the state is greater than the individual; the individual serves the state, and the state is paramount in all things. My own opinion of what constitutes a left-winger or a right-winger is this: if you believe the individual serves the state, you are a left-winger; if you believe the state serves the individual, you are a right-winger.

Those who call themselves “democratic socialists” will doubtless say the state serves the individual and vice versa, but their idea of the size of the roles of the state and the individual should play in society still makes them left-wingers in my opinion. Our Founding Fathers had some choice words to say about the role of the state and the individual in American society, and what the democratic socialists envision for American society lies in the middle between what our Founders envisioned and what Marx envisioned; it lies between the midpoint and the far left point of the spectrum.

Those who claim the fascists are right-wing cite racism as the reason, as if being racist is one of the symptoms of being far-right. I don't buy that crap. Racism is a part of bigotry, bigotry is an evil, and evil (in whatever form) transcends groups. Race, ethnicity, age, sex, nationality, religion; there's always at least one bigot in every group. To use any form of bigotry as a factor in deciding one's political location is misleading.

Calling Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, Alex Jones, Jesse Ventura, VDARE, the BNP, Vlaams Belang, Stormfront and others racists or bigots or just crazy is one thing (whether you're wrong or not depends on the individual or group in question), but if you want to know whether they are right-wing or left-wing, ask them what they think is the role of the individual and the role of the state in society. If their answer isn't crystal clear, look at where they stand on the issues and discern how it affects the individual. There's no other way, in my opinion, to decide one's place in the political spectrum.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Empty Suit

Marlin Stutzman has the first television ad for his campaign:


If any of you reading this live in Indiana, by all means take a look at the ad, and afterwards, visit his campaign website. And, of course, if you can, a donation wouldn't hurt.

Fearmongering from the Anti-Defamation League

As was the case last March on school vouchers, the Anti-Defamation League is at it again, only this time, the ADL is focusing on the supposedly looming threat of violence resulting from what it describes as increasing anti-government animosity.

The ADL filed a “special report”, beginning with an introduction on the “growing animosity”. They present the reasons cited for the opposition to the President and his policies, but then go on to say:
Some of these assertions are motivated by prejudice, but more common is an intense strain of anti-government distrust and anger, colored by a streak of paranoia and belief in conspiracies.
Sounds like a rehashing of the same crap to me. Part one of its report attempts to show the anger in the mainstream elements of society, starting with the Tea Party movement. They claim the ideas promoted by Tea Partiers come from the fringe of society. Having attended a few Tea Parties, the 9/12 March and the Bachmann rally, to call the ideas being promoted as being from the fringe is the same as calling Bill O’Reilly a far-right nutcase.

The next two sections are aimed at the town hall “disruptions” and the “building anger” of the 9/12 March and the Bachmann rally. The ADL points to the heated atmosphere of the town hall meetings, comparisons of President Obama to Hitler and signs at the March and the rally featuring images described as either Nazi, racist or violent as proof of this so-called building anger. And yet, the actual threats of violence have come from opponents of the Tea Parties and like-minded rallies, not from the Tea Partiers. The ADL, however, doesn't note that.

The last two sections of part one look at the Birther movement, contending they are “egged on” by people like Philip Berg (a genuine nut) and bunching him together with other notable Birthers (who I seriously doubt are nuts), and the influence of the mainstream media, which primarily consists of one man: Glenn Beck. If the ADL considers Glenn Beck mainstream media, I wonder what they would describe CNN.

Part two of the report goes after the anger from the fringe elements, with the first section aimed at Alex Jones, the “Conspiracy King” as they call him (whether he is a genuine nut or not, I don't know), and the second section on some of the notable conspiracy theories brought up recently (one of them debunked by Glenn Beck, of all people). The next two sections are focused on action taken by people who took the conspiracy theories seriously, and the rest of part two is on organizations the ADL suspects are hinting at armed resistance to the government, namely the Oath Keepers (not buying it), the Three Percenters (don't know who they are) and the Militia movement (are they kidding me?).

The problem with the ADL's report is their assertion the nutcases and the truly violent ones represent the mainstream of this anti-government anger, when they, in fact, represent the fringe (and a marginalized fringe, at that). Their “proof” is used to back up their overexaggerated claims, but the “proof” itself is also overexaggerated. And of course, repeating myself, the ADL also completely overlooks the fact the real threat hasn't come from the Tea Parties or the Birthers or the Oath Keepers, but from its opponents (SEIU, ANSWER, the Black Panthers, etc.).

Again repeating myself here, this report is a rehashing of the same crap as far as I'm concerned. If only the ADL would actually focus on the real threats instead of being fearmongers with a bunch of overexaggerated claims only a willing idiot would believe.

Update (8:18 PM EST): Robert S. McCain at The Other McCain has a post on the ADL's report as well; he ddescribes the gist of the report more succinctly than I do.

The latest from Sarah: Tonight on Hannity

Governor Palin has some news for her 1 million+ fans on Facebook:

It was a privilege to sit on the Fox News set last night with Sean Hannity. He's a great American. Be sure to watch tonight at 9pm, ET.

- Sarah Palin
It's a date then; nine o'clock, I'll be watching.

Lagging behind

Unfortunately, once again, I've been lagging on things I've wanted to write about. Anyway, on to the subjects at hand.

Rally for Rifqa

Yesterday, a rally was held in Columbus, Ohio for Rifqa Bary. Sadly, I was unable to attend the event (I wish I could have), but fortunately, hundreds attended the rally. Pamela Geller (who covered the rally and has more), Robert Spencer, Nonie Darwish and others spoke at the event. I hope the message was heard loud and clear by the authorities in Ohio concerning Rifqa, and I can't tell how much I hope Rifqa's life will be spared.

Responding to Tea Partiers, Fascist style

I find it interesting critics of the Tea Party movement (and like-minded movements) express their concerns of violence from them, even though accounts of attacks on Tea Partiers by left-wing groups like SEIU seem to go beneath their radar. A recent attack on Tea Partiers by another left-wing group, ANSWER, also went underneath their radar. The real concern should be focused on groups like SEIU & ANSWER, whenever their members are physically assaulting Tea Partiers (much like Nazi stormtroopers and the Ku Klux Klan). Of course, to expect the critics to take notice is simply wishful thinking.

More from Sarah

Here's the latest from Sarah Palin on Facebook:

I had a great conversation with Rush today. We spoke about the issues facing our nation, the future of the Republican party and touched on other great topics.

You can listen here:

Part One:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Noxo36ZUI3E

Part Two:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozher96_lkQ
I listened to the interview on Rush Limbaugh's show yesterday, and I loved what she had to say about illegal immigration. Also, Governor Palin announced earlier her having now 1 million fans on Facebook. Now, that's a milestone; further proof what she has to say holds a lot of weight with a lot of people.

Back on the subject of interviews, I haven't seen her interview with Barbara Walters yet, but I know where to go. What I didn't expect, though, is the other interviews already appearing; with the website RedState and the magazines People and National Review. Boy, oh boy, I've got a lot of catching up to do.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

The latest from Sarah: Multi-Part Interview with Barbara Walters

Multi-Part Interview with Barbara Walters

Had a great conversation today with Barbara Walters regarding America’s special needs community. Her compassion for those who some in our society see as “less than perfect” comes from personal experience as she was so close to her sister. Barbara wrote lovingly about her sister in her #1 bestselling memoir titled, Audition. Barbara and I even attempted to interview Trig during this segment, but he was about as patient through the interview as any other one-and-a-half-year-old child! I appreciate Barbara highlighting America’s special needs community. The beautiful heart of our country shines when we embrace these precious ones. Knowing of their unconditional love and need for our embrace reminds me every day of what really matters in this world.

- Sarah Palin

Don't know when the interview will be on, but I look forward to it.

Monday, November 16, 2009

The latest from Sarah: Newsweek

Here's the latest from Sarah Palin on Facebook:
Newsweek

The choice of photo for the cover of this week's Newsweek is unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this "news" magazine has relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The Runner's World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was taken was all about health and fitness - a subject to which I am devoted and which is critically important to this nation. The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now. If anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do anything to draw attention - even if out of context.

- Sarah Palin
I saw the Newsweek cover and at first thought it had to be a joke. Needless to say, the nerve of Newsweek (and for that matter, the media) sometimes astounds me.

On some interesting pieces

Every day, I come across a lot of interesting articles, essays and blog posts; some of them I would like to blog about, but don't usually have the time to do. So, I decided to bunch some of them together for today. And here we go:

Doug Hoffman conceded the election for NY's 23rd District seat to now-Congressman Bill Owens, but going over uncounted votes has narrowed the margin quite a bit. Still a long shot for Hoffman, but if he ends up with the most votes, Owens will have to go. Talk about not counting the chickens before they're hatched.

The argument for legalizing abortion was to decrease the rate of deaths from so-called back alley abortions, but apparently the facts behind the claims are bogus. No surprise to me to find the pro-abortion crowd using falsified facts & figures all these years to back up their absurd claims and arguments.

Nancy Morgan at Canada Free Press brought up a very good question: What's wrong with taking pride in being white? Blacks are encouraged to revel in their heritage, as are Asians, Hispanics, Jews and so on, so why can't whites take the same amount of pride in being white? The idea bigotry is relegated only to whites is absolutely ridiculous, and yet the idea continues to be espoused today.

The Cato Institute published an interesting blog post about the two groups. The question brought up is whether the Tea Party movement (and I assume, the 9/12 movement as well) helps or hazards the Republican Party, but Roger Pilon wonders in the blog post whether the GOP helps or hazards the Tea Party movement

Former Congressman Tom Tancredo, in his latest column, wrote of how it was possible for Army Major Nidal Hasan to commit his atrocious crimes in Fort Hood, Texas. It is nothing short of appalling how this piece of scum was able to continue serving in the Army despite clear signs, but it's doubly appalling to see how people have been making excuses for his crimes. Monstrous.

Sarah on Oprah

The only reason I've ever wanted to watch Oprah Winfrey's show turned up today: Sarah Palin. The publicized interview aired this afternoon, and yes, I saw the show.

I found the interview to be pretty good on the whole, in spite of Oprah's mild badgering in her questioning on a couple of occasions, as well as trying to get a good word in for President Obama once during the beginning of the interview.

Two things which stood out for me were when Oprah mentioned not knowing who Governor Palin when John McCain introduced her as his running mate in the 2008 election. It told me Oprah doesn't read Alaska magazine; otherwise she'd have known of the February 2008 issue which ran a cover story on “America's Hottest Governor”. The other thing of note was when Governor Palin spoke of the time she found out she was pregnant with her son, Trig, and told her husband the good news. I knew I liked these people!

Fellow Blogger for Sarah Palin Josh Painter has more on the interview with Oprah here, here and here. A final thing of note: whatever Governor Palin will do in the future (near, foreseeable & unforeseeable), she has my support. I look forward to tomorrow when she'll appear on Rush Limbaugh's radio show.

By the way, if anybody reading this doesn't have Adobe Reader, here's the article in the Alaska magazine issue from February 2008 I mentioned.

RIP Edward Woodward

Going through the latest updates on Twitter, I discovered the tag “RIP Edward Woodward”. Clicking on the link to an article from the BBC, I discovered the sad news that the actor passed away at the age of 79.

Like many people, I remember Edward Woodward well in the TV series The Equalizer. When I was only a few years old, I first saw the opening of The Equalizer, but wasn't able to appreciate the show until many years later when I saw episodes of it on A&E. I also saw his most famous film, The Wicker Man. I can see why he was so well known for this film.

The film I remember him best in, however, was the 1984 adaptation of Charles Dickens' classic novel A Christmas Carol. George C. Scott starred as Ebenezer Scrooge, and Mr. Woodward appeared as the Ghost of Christmas Present. His performance was as memorable as George C. Scott's. I watch that film every year during the Christmas season.

He was a good actor who doubtlessly will be missed by all. Rest in peace, Mr. Woodward.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Yes, Governor, they're still making things up

Sarah Palin comments in her latest Facebook note on the efforts of the Associated Press to “fact-check” her upcoming book:

The book tour starts this week, and I look forward to it! I'm most looking forward to meeting many of you, shaking your hands, and telling you,"Thanks for loving America." I'll give you a scoop here and tell you what's on the book's Dedication Page – it's dedicated to you – Patriots – who love the U.S.A. as much as I do.

Amazingly, but not surprisingly, the AP somehow nabbed a copy of the book before it was released. They're now erroneously reporting on the book's contents and are repeating many of the same things they spewed during the campaign and afterwards. We've heard 11 writers are engaged in this opposition research, er, "fact checking" research! Imagine that – 11 AP reporters dedicating time and resources to tearing up the book, instead of using the time and resources to "fact check" what's going on with Sheik Mohammed's trial, Pelosi's health care takeover costs, Hassan's associations, etc. Amazing.

We'll keep setting the record straight, and we'll keep reminding some in the media that Americans are very tired of their non-objective reporting. A great, recent post that accomplishes this is a Conservatives4Palin post. It's got some nice fact checking included. As always, they did a great job holding some of the media accountable for spreading more misinformation and for making things up. You can read it here. Enjoy!

And I can't wait to see you! God bless the fight for freedom! Keep up the great work, Patriots who love this country.

- Sarah Palin
I saw the article myself, and I find it interesting 11 reporters are assigned to dig for any possible flaw or falsehood they can find on Governor Palin's new book. Another blogger (I don't know who) made a very good point: How many reporters were assigned to fact-check Barack Obama's book Dreams From My Father?

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Thank you, Bishop D'Arcy

After almost a quarter of a century as the head of the Catholic Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Bishop John D'Arcy is stepping down. The Fort Wayne News-Sentinel has the story on the Bishop's retirement, with also mention of his history both as head of the Fort Wayne-South Bend Diocese, and his time in the Boston Archdiocese (as well as some info on his successor, Bishop Kevin Rhoades).

Being someone who is strongly pro-life and participates in pro-life efforts here in Northeastern Indiana, Bishop D'Arcy has my deep gratitude and thanks for his work in the pro-life movement. For his efforts to stop sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, he warrants everybody's deep gratitude and thanks.

Bishop D'Arcy, thank you once again for all you've done, and all the best to you in your future; I know it will be well for you.

Update (4:34 PM EST): The ArchAngel Institute also has additional info on the incoming head of the Fort Wayne-South Bend Diocese, Bishop Kevin Rhoades. I wish Bishop Rhoades the best as he assumes the office.

Friday, November 13, 2009

The latest from Sarah: Obama Administration's Atrocious Decision

From her latest Facebook note:

Horrible decision, absolutely horrible. It is devastating for so many of us to hear that the Obama Administration decided that the 9/11 terrorist mastermind, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, will be given a criminal trial in New York. This is an atrocious decision.

Mohammed and his terrorist co-conspirators are responsible for the deaths of more than 3,000 Americans. Thousands of American families have suffered through the loss of loved ones because of the disgusting attacks launched against the United States, and now this trial venue adds insult to injury, in addition to compromising our efforts in the War on Terror. Heaven forbid our allies see this decision as a reason to become less likely to support our efforts in the future.

Criminal defense attorneys will now enter into delaying tactics and other methods in the hope of securing some kind of win for their “clients.” The trial will afford Mohammed the opportunity to grandstand and make use of his time in front of the world media to rally his disgusting terrorist cohorts. It will also be an insult to the victims of 9/11, as Mohammed will no doubt use the opportunity to spew his hateful rhetoric in the same neighborhood in which he ruthlessly cut down the lives of so many Americans.

It is crucially important that Americans be made aware that the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks may walk away from this trial without receiving just punishment because of a “hung jury” or from any variety of court room technicalities. If we are stuck with this terrible Obama Administration decision, I like most Americans, hope that Mohammed and his co-conspirators are convicted. Hang ‘em high.

I wholeheartedly support the survivors and the families of the victims in their appeal to the president regarding this matter. You can read more about it here.

- Sarah Palin
What Khalid Sheikh Mohammed participated in was not a criminal act, but an act of terror, an act of war. This “human being” should stand trial in a military tribunal, not in a civilian court. And like Governor Palin, I hope they are convicted and we hang 'em high.

The latest from Sarah: Keep your powder dry

With the release date of Sarah Palin's memoir Going Rogue coming this Tuesday, news outlets have been releasing snippets and previews of the book, but Governor Palin warns us in her latest note on Facebook:

As you probably have heard, the AP snagged a copy of my memoir, Going Rogue, before its Tuesday release. And as is expected, the AP and a number of subsequent media outlets are erroneously reporting the contents of the book. Keep your powder dry, read the book, and enjoy it! Lots of great stories about my family, Alaska, and the incredible honor it was to run alongside Senator John McCain.

We can't wait to hit the road and meet so many on the book tour! See you in Michigan first...

- Sarah Palin
I can't wait for my copy to come (courtesy of Wal-Mart), but unfortunately, I won't be able to attend either of the book signings in Indiana. Oh well, I guess.

Grassroots News Minute (November 13th)

Thursday, November 12, 2009

It's not even Thanksgiving yet!

Since this past Saturday night, there have been times when I'm driving and listening to the FM radio stations when all of a sudden, I'm hearing The Beach Boys singing “Merry Christmas, St. Nick”, Bruce Springsteen singing “Merry Christmas Baby”, Nat King Cole singing “The Christmas Song”, and this afternoon at 3 P.M., I heard Bobby Rydell singing “Jingle Bell Rock”.

What is going on here? Thanksgiving is two weeks away, and I'm hearing Christmas songs on the radio! Now I'm starting to feel like the characters in the Peanuts special It's Christmastime Again, Charlie Brown who respond to Charlie Brown when he's selling Christmas wreaths: “It isn't even Thanksgiving yet!

The latest from Sarah: Thank you, Washington


I commend the president for acknowledging today that “there are limits to what government can and should do” to ease our 10.2% unemployment rate – the highest it’s been since 1983. I also applaud his call for suggestions and expression of openness to considering “any demonstrably good idea.” Taking him at his word, I’d like to suggest this one: let’s learn from history and follow the example of the man who occupied the White House in 1983 and was able to transform an even worse recession than the one we’re currently experiencing into the largest peacetime economic expansion in American history.

When you realize the magnitude of President Reagan’s achievements, there is absolutely no reason why anyone would ignore his “demonstrably good” example. If you want real job growth, cut taxes – including capital gains taxes and small business payroll taxes – and slay the death tax once and for all. If you want to stimulate the economy and help poor and middle class families, cut payroll taxes so that more Americans can keep and invest more of what they earn.

If you want lasting economic expansion and prosperity, get the federal government’s budget under control. Instead of more pork-laden stimulus plans, let the free market correct itself. That’s what Reagan did, and history proves it worked.

In his comments today, the president honorably suggested that he welcomes our ideas on how to put America’s economy on the right track. But, there also seemed to be a suggested chastisement of the private sector’s efforts to right some economic wrongs when he said, “...small businesses and large firms...have not yet been willing to take the steps necessary to hire again.”

As business owners seek to expand, or just to keep doors open today, it’s not as if they are refusing to hire out of spite. Given a pro-private sector environment they will be only too happy to hire more people and grow their businesses. Perhaps if leadership in Washington reassured them by, for example, cutting tax burdens and making government more efficient, it would send our businesses a message that it’s safe and smart to expand today.

These are difficult times for so many Americans who are out of work. I implore our leaders to not threaten our economy’s job creators with increased taxes and job-killing schemes like cap-and-tax and the government health care takeover. Government needs to get out of their way and off their backs so that they can grow and hire again.

The lessons of history are clear. We’re blessed to have so many lessons from which to learn, and we’d be smart to emulate successes in America’s past. Our economic recovery decisions should be based on the same free market principles that Reagan employed. They work, history proves it, and I thank our president for asking for this input.

- Sarah Palin
I certainly hope the President takes this input to heart, but I fear he won't.